Jump to content

Zebulon

Members
  • Content count

    1,408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Zebulon

  1. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Mister Uzun, you're welcome to complete a formal cross-examination." (( @Maikeyy2 @Wright @Napol ))
  2. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Kyle Dwayne Scott Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the July 4th, 2018, against Kyle Dwayne Scott. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: GF001 - Battery MO002 - Aggravated Assault MO008 - Disturbing the Peace Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Kyle Dwayne Scott to the following: 3 years 00.00 USD Financial Penalty Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - Officer Affidavit Exhibit 2 - Witness Statement Exhibit 3 - CCTV Footage Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Kyle Dwayne Scott was forwarded to the District Attorney’s Office on grounds that the Defendants had violated San Andreas laws, primarily battery and aggravated assault. The Prosecution wishes that the court review the evidence held against the defendant, and come to a swift judgment regarding the allegations against them. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release Yes Release on Bail Yes 2500 Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
  3. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Jasin Davis Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 10th of July, 2018, against Jasin Davis. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: DF001 - Controlled Substance Possession Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Jasin Davis to the following: 12 Months $2000.00 USD Financial Penalty Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - Arrest Officer Narrative/Affidavit Exhibit 2 - Evidence Report Exhibit 3 - Dash-cam footage from Arrest. Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Jasin Davis was forwarded to the District Attorney’s Office on grounds that the Defendants had violated San Andreas laws, primarily being in possession of a controlled substance. The Prosecution wishes that the court review the evidence held against the defendant, and come to a swift judgment regarding the allegations against them. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release Yes Release on Bail Yes One Thousand United States Dolalrs Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
  4. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Tyson Abella Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 18th of June, 2018, against Tyson Abella. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: SF004 - Attempted First Degree Murder GF024 - Felony Obstruction WF007 - Shooting From a Vehicle WF010 - Possession of NFA Items WF002 - Carrying an Unlicensed Firearm Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Tyson Abella to the following: LIFE IMPRISONMENT $35,000.00 USD Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - **CCTV Footage showing the shooting, and the side profile of the shooter, his lower facial features matching Tyson Abela's** Exhibit 2 - **A comparison of pictures of tracks in the sand, showing the tracks left by the shooter and the tracks left by Abela are one and the same** Exhibit 3 - **A positive GSR test, proving Abela fired a firearm in the hours leading up to his arrest** Exhibit 4 - Interview with T. Abella (https://pastebin.com/TcVc2mEX) Exhibit 5 - **Dispatch Logs** Exhibit 6 - LSPD Seizure Report Exhibit 7 - LSPD Seizure Report Exhibit 8 - Arresting Officer Narrative Exhibit 9 - Arrest & Guilty Plea of Dean Bozic Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Tyson Abella was forwarded to the District Attorney’s Office on grounds that the Defendants had violated San Andreas laws, primarily attempted first degree murder. The Prosecution wishes that the court review the evidence held against the defendant, and come to a swift judgment regarding the allegations against them. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release No Release on Bail No Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @ThatGuy @Snazz @Urshankov @bartman ))
  5. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "The Witness is approved to take the stand." (( @Wright))
  6. Zebulon

    Department of Licensing Perms

    Confirmed.
  7. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Mister Uzun, you have pleaded not-guilty to these charges. You may make a statement in your defense." (( @Napol @Wright ))
  8. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "The Prosecution's review of this item is noted, and indeed offers better insight on the matters. It is however not the only charge being brought against Mister Uzun. Miss MacKenzie, for the time being, please move forward. The court will review all charges against Mister Uzun again before deliberation." (( @Napol @Wright ))
  9. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Aries Nightingale [6/11]

    "No, not explicitly." (( @0rbz @EvilScotsman ))
  10. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "A pattern of behaviour is valid to raise as evidence. There is no need to justify why you used your fifth ammendedment rights. It is noted however that the Defendant's inability to recall details from less than a month ago is indeed convienenet for their Defense however may prove troublesome later in this litigation. The Prosecution may continue its course of examination noting that pleading the fifth is not grounds for presumed guilt as it is a constitutional right." (( @Wright @Napol ))
  11. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Very well. Let the record reflect that Mister Uzun testified that he does not recall where the Audi was at the time of the incident. The Prosecution may continues it's course." (( @Napol @Wright ))
  12. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "I am confused Mister Uzun... Can you please clarify for the court, your statements of possession of the Audi at the time of the incident as indicated by the LSPD?" (( @Napol @Wright ))
  13. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Mister Uzun, your testimony puts beyond reasonable doubt that you were at the time of the incident in question, and remain, in possession of the Audi that you previously claimed that the Prosecution would have to prove was so. Do you have any response to this?" (( @Napol @Wright ))
  14. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Motion sustained. Mister Uzun please take the stand." (( @Napol @Wright ))
  15. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "The Prosecution's duty is indeed Burden of Proof, however this extends to beyond -reasonable- doubt, which is my job to determine, thank you. Because you have chosen to defend yourself Mister Uzun, and for the organization of this case, I wish to have each charge examined without hopping between them all the time. So since your possession of the bike is currently being contested I would invite the Prosecution to deliver it's evidence and arguments for why Mister Uzun is believed to have been in possession and control of said vehicle." (( @Napol @Wright ))
  16. New Positions Open ______________________________________________________ POSITION TITLE: COUNTY ORDINANCE OFFICER DEPARTMENT: COUNTY ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY OF DUTIES: To enforce the various regulatory Ordinances of the County, primarily the Business & Gambling Establishment Licensing Regulations Ordinance of 2017. SUPERVISED BY: County Commissioner's Office or Designate MAJOR RESPONSIBILITIES: BASIC REQUIREMENTS (1) Applicant is over the age of majority (21) (2) Applicant possesses a College Baccalaureate or greater. (3) Applicant is a resident in any recognized municipality or county within the boundaries of the State of San Andreas. (4) Applicant resides a fixed address which they can be contacted at. (5) Applicant has spent at least ten months within the State of San Andreas at a fixed residence. May be subject to waiver by County Commissioner's Office or Designate. ((10 Days on server. And 25 hours IG. )) (6) Applicant does not hold a criminal record consisting of any felony, or misdemeanors against property or person and may be temporarily denied for lesser misdemeanors that have been recorded within the past two years. ((2 months.)) (7) Applicant must complete and submit a detailed Curriculum Vitae, outlining their past work experience, interest they have in the position, and any other relevant information. (( PM @Zebby& @DylanW )) (8) Applicant must undergo an interview and selection phase, at the discretion of the County Commissioner's Office or Designate. Authorized by CPQL County Commissioner Thomas Mengele
  17. **Advert would be posted online and on job-sites.**
  18. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "It would be more appropriate for the Prosecution to call a witness." (( @Wright @Napol ))
  19. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Would the Prosecution care to have an opportunity to respond to the Defense?" (( @Wright @Napol ))
  20. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People V. Jasin Davis [07/10]

    (( @ThatGuy no idea sorry.))
  21. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Very well Mister Uzun. Now to address your motions... Your motion to dismiss the charge of Drug Trafficking, is denied. By law, within the State of San Andreas, being in possession of narcotics in excess of fifty grams is considered to be Trafficking. By definition therefore, I cannot sustain that motion. In terms of the charge of Felony Public Endangerment, it would be remiss of the court not to allow the Prosecution due time to pursue the charges they have laid against you, and at this time, there is cause to believe that a reasonable argument may be made. Both motions are denied and the Prosecution may begin with opening statements." (( @Napol @Wright ))
  22. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Mister Uzun, you need to enter a formal plea to your charges." (( @Napol ))
  23. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "Mister Uzun, you may now enter your plea to your charges. You may do so for each individual charge or, for the sum of them if you so please."
  24. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    "You may post bail. In the meantime, do you plan to represent yourself in this matter?" (( @Napol ))
  25. Zebulon

    [STATE] The People v. Solak Uzun

    *Justice Ross enters the courtroom, examining the documents and nods to the woman sitting at the prosecution's desk.* "Is the Defense present?" (( @Napol @Wright ))
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and follow our Guidelines.