Jump to content

Zebulon

Members
  • Content count

    960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Zebulon last won the day on December 5 2017

Zebulon had the most liked content!

About Zebulon

  • Rank
    Veteran Member

MTA Information

  • MTA Account
    Zebulon
  • Factions
    LSPD, SCoSA
  • Characters
    Steven Spade

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Canada

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    Zebulon#7669

Recent Profile Visitors

2,067 profile views
  1. (( @GamerX27 how did u attain cctv footage? ))
  2. *Justice Ross enters the court room and would read over the appeal documents.* (( @Restrepo ))
  3. Earl Irwin v. Robbie Mason

    "Detective Mason? Where are these arrests you claimed were made?" (( @SjoerdPSV @Jord @Wright ))
  4. [STATE] The People v. Lochlainn Foley

    "Your Honour this case is an example of well executed Police-work on behalf of the LSPD. Mister Foley, has been found to be in possession of numerous illicit items including stolen firearms, and copious amounts of controlled substances and Narcotics. The District Attorney's Office sees the evidence procured in the search of his residence to be prima facie and his attempts to deceive Law Enforcement in regards to his alleged stolen motorbike as confirmation of his intentions to wreak havoc on innocent citizens, poison the community with drugs, and potentially even terrorize the good people of Los Santos with misappropriated weapons." "The Prosecution invites Mister Foley to account for his possession of these items in his attempts at rebuttal." (( @ThatGuy @JayZawack ))
  5. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Thomas Keith Burgess Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 14th of February, 2018, against Thomas Keith Burgess. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: TF001 - Felony Reckless Evasion TF007 - Felony Public Endangerment ☒ - Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Thomas Keith Burgess to the following: 3 Years, ((3 Days)) Fine of $10,000 in accordance with San Andreas Penal Code Seizure of Vehicle Used in Commission of Felonious Crimes. Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Thomas Keith Burgess was forwarded to the District Attorney’s Office on grounds that the Defendants had violated San Andreas laws including Reckless Evasion, and Public Endangerment. The Prosecution wishes that the court review the evidence held against the defendant, and come to a swift judgment regarding the allegations against them. Subpart 6. Recommendation. ☒ - Issue Parole After Release ☑- Grant Early Release ☑- Release On Bail of $7,000 Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @ThatGuy @Urshankov @Bart ))
  6. [STATE] The People v. Lucy Belshaw

    *Robert turns his head to look at the bench, remaining silent.* (( @JameZ @[email protected]))
  7. [STATE] The People v. Lucy Belshaw

    "To answer your question, the detainment commenced to my understanding, when I instruced Miss Belshaw to pull her vehicle over. I also think you are misinformed regarding Miranda laws Councillor." (( @Lewis @ThatGuy @JameZ ))
  8. [STATE] The People v. Lucy Belshaw

    " No I did not at that time. However, any experienced Law Enforcement Officer knows that Miranda Rights are only read after a person has been taken into custody if the person is to be questioned. Prior to that, admissions made to Police are voluntary and therefore still deemed admissible evidence to the best of my knowlegde. Furthermore, even if I hadn't questioned her at the time, my witnessing of her actions still constituted cause for arrest under the aforementioned charges." (( @Lewis @JameZ @ThatGuy ))
  9. [STATE] The People v. Lucy Belshaw

    "Can you please specify when she was Questioned?" (( @JameZ @Lewis @ThatGuy ))
  10. [STATE] The People v. Lucy Belshaw

    "I just told you Councillor." (( @Lewis @ThatGuy @JameZ ))
  11. [STATE] The People v. Lucy Belshaw

    "With all due respect Councillor, I feel I am repeating myself... Based on my professional experience, and view in my rear-view, Miss Belshaw lost control of her vehicle and narrowly a collision with myself and a wall. I feel that her being handcuffed to her passenger also must have played a part in her lack of ability to control her vehicle. Anyone who knowingly handicaps themselves in that way is making a reckless decision." (( @Lewis @JameZ @ThatGuy ))
  12. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Tay Jordan Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 11th of February, 2018, against Tay Jordan. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: TF001 - Felony Reckless Evasion VC041 - Reckless Driving VC003 - Driving Without a License MO007 - Resisting Arrest ☒ - Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Tay Jordan to the following: 3 Years, ((3 Days)) Fine of $7,000 in accordance with San Andreas Penal Code 7 Day Impound of Vehicle Used Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1. Exhibit 2. Exhibit 3. Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Tay Jordan was forwarded to the District Attorney’s Office on grounds that the Defendants had violated San Andreas laws including Reckless Driving, Reckless Evasion, Driving Without a License and Resisting Arrest. The Prosecution wishes that the court review the evidence held against the defendant, and come to a swift judgment regarding the allegations against them. Subpart 6. Recommendation. ☒ - Issue Parole After Release ☑- Grant Early Release ☑- Release On Bail of $10,000 Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @therichkid @Krakkfaen @ThatGuy @Urshankov ))
  13. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Aman Dhillon Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 9th of February, 2018, against Aman Dhillon. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: TF007 - Felony Public Endangerment ☒ - Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Aman Dhillon to the following: 4 Years, ((4 Days)) Fine of $5,000 in accordance with San Andreas Penal Code Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1. Exhibit 2. Exhibit 3. Exhibit 5. Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Aman Dhillon was forwarded to the District Attorney’s Office on grounds that the Defendants had violated San Andreas laws specifically Public Endangerment while operating a motor vehicle. The Prosecution wishes that the court review the evidence held against the defendant, and come to a swift judgment regarding the allegations against them. Subpart 6. Recommendation. ☒ - Issue Parole After Release ☑- Grant Early Release ☑- Release On Bail of $4,000 Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @Urshankov @ThatGuy @Lancelot Not sure players name. ))
  14. Earl Irwin v. Robbie Mason

    "Indeed there does seem to be some inconsistencies here yes.. Is any of this documented Detective Mason at all? And yes, Open Carry is fully permissible under the law of this state, however it is also worthy to note that not all weapons are licensed within the state and I believe an Officer has a right to make a brief detention of the subject to ensure that they are indeed licensed to carry. The court will summon a representative of the LSPD to provide documentation of these alleged arrests... By chance did these arrests lead to any convictions Detective Mason?" (( @SjoerdPSV @Jord @Wright @EDR @Restrepo ))
  15. Earl Irwin v. Robbie Mason

    "Can you please provide the court with documentation of these arrests?" (( @Jord @SjoerdPSV @Wright ))
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, and follow our Guidelines.