Jump to content

Zebulon

Members
  • Content Count

    2,261
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Zebulon last won the day on November 2 2018

Zebulon had the most liked content!

About Zebulon

MTA Information

  • MTA Account
    Zebulon
  • Factions
    LSPD, SCoSA
  • Characters
    Steven Spade

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Canada

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    Zebulon#7669

Recent Profile Visitors

3,653 profile views
  1. *Steven Spade enters the courtroom* "Your Honor, You will find in this file, a copy of the arraignment posted for Mister Wilson, as well as the warrant for his arrest, and the arrest documentation....Everything should be included within these documents your Honor."
  2. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Zachary Wilson Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the May, 20th, 2019, against Zachary Wilson. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: SF021 - Felony Reckless Endagerment MO049- Public Endangerment MO048 - Negligence of Duty Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Zachary Wilson to the following: 10 Years ((Days)) Seventeen Thousand, Five Hundred Dollar Fine Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - Statement From Officer Officer M. Greene, LSPD contained in original IA Report (April 27th, 2019) Exhibit 2 - Radio Logs of Z. Wilson Confirming Ride Along Presence Exhibit 3 - Footage turned in by Officer. M. Greene as part of IA report. Exhibit 4 - Traffic Enforcement Unit Handbook Exhibit 5 - The People v. William Callahan Exhibit 6 - LSPD Pursuit Protocols - Cpt. Woodvine. 5/19 Exhibit 7 - LSPD Policies and Regulations - Last Updated 1/19 Exhibit 8 - LSPD Department Handbook Excerpt Exhibit 9 - IA Report Filed Against Z. Wilson, April 28, 2019 Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Zachary Wilson was taken by the District Attorney's Office after LSPD IA received numerous complaints against the defendant. After a review of evidence included, alongside LSPD handbooks, regulations, protocols, case precedent and policies, it was determined that probable cause existed to arraign the defendant on the aforementioned charges. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release Yes Release on Bail Yes Seven Thousand Dollars Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @Restrepo @ThatGuy @Urshankov @EvilScotsman @bartman ))
  3. (( @Luigikuik @ThatGuy @bartman @EvilScotsman @Urshankov ))
  4. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Yuu Nagashima Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 5th of May, 2019, against Yuu Nagashima. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: WF009 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons WF011 - Assault Weapons & Rifles MO003 - Carrying a Dirk, Dagger, or Assisted Opening Blade Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Yuu Nagashima to the following: Six Years ((Days)) Eleven Thousand Dollar Fine Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - Officer Affidavit Exhibit 2- Dashcam Footage Exhibit 3 - Evidence Report Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Yuu Nagashima was brought to the District Attorney's Office of Los Santos on grounds that Yuu Nagashima had violated the laws of the State of San Andreas; primarily the unlawful possession of automatic weapons. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release No Release on Bail No NOT RECCOMENDED Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @croozerdog @ThatGuy @bartman @Urshankov @EvilScotsman ))
  5. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Bruce Dewitt Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 5th of May, 2019, against Bruce Dewitt. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: WF009 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons WF011 - Assault Weapons & Rifles Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Bruce Dewitt to the following: Four Years ((Days)), Ten Thousand Dollar Fine Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - Officer Affidavit Exhibit 2 - Evidence Report Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Bruce Dewitt was brought to the District Attorney's Office of Los Santos on grounds that Bruce Dewitt had violated the laws of the State of San Andreas; specifically unlawful possession of automatic weapons. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release Yes Release on Bail Yes Seven Thousand Dollars Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
  6. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Nathan Palazzo Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 11th of May, 2019, against Nathan Palazzo. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: VC039 - Evading an Officer VC041 - Reckless Driving MO007 - Resisting Arrest WF009 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons WF011 - Assault Weapons & Rifles WF003 - Being Armed with a Firearm during the Commission of a Felony Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? Yes Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Nathan Palazzo to the following: Ten Years (Days), Twelve Thousand Dollar Fine Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - Dashcam Footage Exhibit 2 - Officer Affidavit Exhibit 2 - Officer's Evidence Report from Incident Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Nathan Palazzo was brought to the District Attorney's Office of Los Santos on grounds that Nathan Palazzo had violated the laws of the State of San Andreas; specifically unlawful possession of automatic weapons, and being armed during the commission of a felony. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release Yes Grant Early Release No Release on Bail No FLIGHT RISK Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @ThatGuy @Sacred @Urshankov @bartman ))
  7. "It must be entered by the Defendant... Why else would I be asking Mister Whitefield?.. Opening statements please Mister Olsson." (( @Wright ))
  8. "... My apologies... The plea of the Defendant will need to be known." (( @TheNeonGuy ))
  9. "Motion for bail is granted at four thousand dollars and a full suspension for all motor vehicle licenses for the duration of this trial shall be enforced....Unless the Defense can provide clear and direct evidence that clearly provides objective reasonings for the account to be struck then the motion is denied.... The Defense may present their opening statements." (( @Wright @Unitts ))
  10. "Does the Prosecution not plan to respond to the motions of the Defense then?" (( @Unitts ))
  11. "Does the prosecution wish to respond before the court passes judgement?" (( @Unitts ))
  12. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Xavier Harrison Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 5th of May, 2019, against Xavier Harrison. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: SF004 - Attempted First Degree Murder WF001 - Drawing, Exhibiting or Using (Brandishing) a Firearm or Weapon WF003 - Being Armed with a Firearm during the Commission of a Felony WF005 - Assault with a Firearm WF009 - Possession of Illegal Firearms/Weapons WF010 - Possession of NFA Items GF025 - Aiding & Abetting GF024 - Felony Obstruction Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Xavier Harrison to the following: Life Imprisonment Twenty Five Thousand Dollar Financial Penalty Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Narrative by US Deputy Marshall Williams Exhibit 2 - Body Cam Footage of Incident Exhibit 3 - Related 911 Call Exhibit 4 - Involved Officer Affidavits Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Xavier Harrison was forwarded to the District Attorney's Office on the grounds that the Defendant had violated San Andreas laws specifically, in the attempted murder of Law Enforcement Officers while in the commission of multiple other felonious acts. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release No Release on Bail No NOT RECCOMENDED Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @ThatGuy @Urshankov @bartman @Mysra ))
  13. *Justice Ross takes a seat at the bench* "Are there any pre trail motions either party would like to make before we begin?" (( @Wright @Unitts ))
  14. "Trooper Monroe. Can you please recount you interactions with Ram Luqman on the day of his arrest." (( @EvilScotsman ))
  15. "If the Witness is invoking his rights, the Prosecution has no questions, and would call upon the next witness, Trooper Monroe of the State Police"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and follow our Guidelines.