Jump to content

Zebulon

Members
  • Content Count

    2,337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Zebulon last won the day on November 2 2018

Zebulon had the most liked content!

About Zebulon

  • Rank
    Veteran Member

MTA Information

  • MTA Account
    Zebulon
  • Factions
    LSPD, SCoSA
  • Characters
    Steven Spade

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Canada

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    Zebulon#7669

Recent Profile Visitors

3,797 profile views
  1. Here’s the meme: You can’t improve illegal RP until you improve the quality of the player base that support an it. So until that happens.... good luck.
  2. "Your Honor, It is quite clear that the Defendant is not well versed in the law. On June 30th, the Defendant and his co-conspirator attempted to fake an incident with the undisputed intentions of falsifying cause for attaining evidence leading to an arrest. This of course backfired but still, in the eyes of the Prosecution constitutes a full attempt. Moreover, the Defendant clearly understood the plan and it's objective. There is no question that the Defendants intentions to manufacture this situation and his actions to detain club-goers inside the building fully justify the charges laid and evidence provided including admissions of conspiracy are sufficient." (( @ThatGuy @Chaotropy ))
  3. "Your Honor, is this a joke? A trained Law Enforcement Officer believing that an officer falsifying a shooting, purposely to manufacture an incident whereby civilians could be detained and searched? Absolutely not. Yes Olsen gave over evidence, but it does not exonerate him from the collusion and participation in the crime. The Defendant now questions the charges of SF008. It is clear that Olsen was in on the plan to "catch that mother fucker" as he said himself. How could that possibly be interpreted in any other way? It is clear insight on the Defendant's intentions. The Prosecution further questions the Defendants alleged presumptions of Sergeant Mendikov... If Officer Stakic did come clean and confess, why was he not arrested for blatant criminal acts on the spot? No Your Honor, the Prosecution firmly denies the Defendant's pleas of ignorance. He knew what the plan was, he acknowledged prior to the acts that the crimes would be worth the results if not caught, and willfully went along without coercion." (( @Chaotropy @ThatGuy ))
  4. "Your Honor, Aarson Olsen is a criminal; corrupt and immoral, acting against the people he was sworn to serve. On the 30th of June, former Officer Roman Stakic, and the Defendant conspired to falsify a shooting, knowing that they might be able to manipulate to the situation to detain, search and ideally find evidence to arrest citizens which they held personal vendettas against. As seen in the Exhibit 3, Oslen, was openly solicited by Stakic to take part in the scheme, and agreed that breaking the law was worth it if it meant the possibility to carry out their devious plan without being caught. Thankfully they were. Not only did Olsen actively participate in the unlawful acts, but also Olsen carried on the ruse failing to make any kind of reports against his counterpart, only throwing him under the buss after being named a suspect, in hopes that the pity-card would give him a free pass. The Persecution firmly believes that the evidence supplied, which contains admissions of guilt, are to be considered prima facie and has even gone so far to offer the Defendant a plea-bargain however this was denied as the Defendant must believe this case is defend-able by some far stretch of their imagination. The Prosecution looks forward to the circus that the Defendant must have prepared." (( @ThatGuy @Chaotropy ))
  5. "No motions on behalf of the Prosecution." (( @ThatGuy ))
  6. “The Prosecution is prepared to proceed Your Honor and heavily suggests that the Defendant seek legal council.” (( @ThatGuy @Chaotropy ))
  7. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Criminal Arraignment Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos The People Versus Aaron Olsen Subpart 1. Title. In the matter of the Petition of The People, on the 9th of July, 2019, against Aaron Olsen. Subpart 2. Body. The People charge the subject(s) with: 18 U.S. Code § 4. Misprision of Felony GF021 - Conspiracy (SF008, SF021, WF001) SF008 - Felony False Imprisonment GF025 - Aiding & Abetting (SF008, WF001) M0048 - Negligence of Duty Are multiple misdemeanors stacked for a felonious conviction? No Subpart 3. Request. The People demand of the subject Aaron Olsen to the following: 21 Years ((21 Days)) in the custody of the San Andreas Department of Corrections Fifty Thousand Dollars Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1. Originating Internal Affairs Report Exhibit 2. Questions to, and Answers from Aaron Olsen by LSPD Internal Affairs Exhibit 3. Audio Transcripts From Incident on June 30th, 2019 Exhibit 4. Arrest & Guilty Plea of Officer Roman Stakic Subpart 5. Narrative. The case against Aaron Olsen was taken by the District Attorney's Office after LSPD Internal Affairs received reports of suspected criminal conspiracy carried out by officers of the Los Santos Police Department. The District Attorney's Office believes Aaron Olsen to be criminally liable for his part in the incident on June 30th, 2019, whereby he took part as a willing co-conspirator in a devious plan to fake a shooting, and unlawfully detain civilians for search, and ideally arrest. Subpart 6. Recommendation. Parole Recommendation After Release No Grant Early Release No Release on Bail Yes Thirty Thousand Dollars Subpart 7. Declaration. I, Steven Spade, District Attorney for San Andreas affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @ThatGuy @Shanks @Chaotropy @bartman @EvilScotsman @Urshankov ))
  8. "The Prosecution is still waiting on the Los Santos Police Department to deliver all footage, and audio recordings from the incident Your Honor. The Prosecution recommends that this case be adjourned until they can be delivered in full, and would not oppose the Defendant being granted bail with restrictions on travel on a bond of seven thousand dollars." (( @Urshankov @Restrepo ))
  9. "Your Honor, Is the Defendant presiding over this case or are you? The LSPD is in the process of collecting said evidence and may require additional time. The Prosecution suggests that the Defendant, who has not had the brilliance to file for their own bail, should refrain from recommending courses of action for this court when they still have a witness on the stand that they are ignoring." (( @Restrepo @Urshankov)) (( waiting for an admin to run logs on all characters involved ))
  10. "Your Honor, The LSPD has yet to fulfil the requests for evidence and the Prosecution is awaiting their response. No Subpoena shall be necessary." (( @Urshankov ))
  11. "Your Honor, Although the Prosecution believes that the sworn testimony of a former Law Enforcement Officer should be sufficient, the Prosecution should be able to attain these records without a subpoena and asks for a 48 hour reccess in order to aquire them. If the court would like to support this with a subpoena then that is also appreciated." (( @Urshankov))
  12. "Objection. Asked and Answered Your Honor." (( @Urshankov ))
  13. "The Prosecution has no more Questions." (( @Urshankov @Restrepo ))
  14. “Thank you Your Honor” (( @Maikeyy2 ))
  15. “Your Honor, Can you please clarify your question to the witness? It’s worded in a confusing manner.” (( @Urshankov ))
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and follow our Guidelines.