JameZ

5 gcs would do?

** The following subpoenas would be handed to the presiding judge upon them entering the courtroom. **

SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Civil Petition Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos Kenneth Campbell Versus Los Santos Police Department Subpart 1. Accusation. In the matter of this civil petition, Kenneth Campbell on the April 18th, 2018, accuses Los Santos Police Department of: Harassment. Violation of 4th Amendment. Subpart 2. Demands. The plaintiff, Kenneth Campbell demands the following: $20,000 in compensation. Formal letter of apology from the Chief of the Police. Subpart 3. Narrative. On the 17th of April, 2018. Kenneth Campbell was simply standing in public minding his own business, when he was approached by an officer ALEXANDRA MCKENZIE from the Los Santos Police Department. OFC. McKenzie began asking a series of questions to CAMPBELL and accused him of being influenced under narcotics, simply because he was "staring into the abyss". CAMPBELL informed OFC. McKenzie that he took Advil pills earlier that morning after being questioned about it, and proceeded to detain him under what she claimed "reasonable suspicion of being influenced under narcotics" and proceeded to detain him. CAMPBELL then underwent a series of checks to his pupils and whatnot, where he checked out to be clean. OFC. McKenzie then proceeded to pat down CAMPBELL, with no reasonable suspicion to believe that CAMPBELL was armed, he was cooperative during the entire process and showed no signs of resistance. Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1. Exhibit 2. Subpart 6. Ancillary Information. Defendant Legal Representation: Clinton Jackson Plaintiff Legal Representation: Contact Information: Presiding Judge: X Subpart 7. Declaration. I, CLINTON JACKSON, affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @ThatGuy @Restrepo @Craazy @Urshankov ))

"Based on what, councillor? You are motioning for a suppression of mister Garth's testimony claiming that it's false, but you provided no evidence to do so? I'd like to bring the court's attention once again to the fact that mister Foley's initial opening statement was done with no legal defense, which is why the defense would like to remove it out of the record." (( @Zebulon @ThatGuy @JayZawack @Maikeyy2 ))

"Objection, your honor. Mister Garth only mentioned that mister Foley came with a van to his property on the 25th, whatever incidents that occurred after that were not mentioned in the DA's question. Unless the DA can prove that mister Foley didn't personally attend mister Garth on the 25th, the defense sees no reasonable grounds to suppress the testimony. Furthermore, in the opening statement by mister Foley, he still had no attorney appointed and the defense finds that it's rather absurd to take mister Foley's statement into record." (( @Zebulon @ThatGuy @JayZawack @Maikeyy2 ))

* Clinton Jackson downs a nod to Robbie with a bright smile. * "Thank you, mister Robbie." * Clinton would then switch his gaze back to Katherine, clearing his throat momentarily. * "No further questions, your honor." (( @ThatGuy @Maikeyy2 @JayZawack @Zebulon ))

"Do you recall what was the model of the van, color or any specific details? Was he also alone?" (( @Maikeyy2 @JayZawack @Zebulon @ThatGuy ))

"Can you clarify whether mister Foley made the way to you in a vehicle or not?" (( @Maikeyy2 @Zebulon @JayZawack @ThatGuy ))

"You mentioned that mister Foley was with you during that day, has he left your company during the said time or was he with you the entire time?" (( @Maikeyy2 @JayZawack @Zebulon @ThatGuy ))

"Mr.Garth, do you recall what happened on the early morning hours of the 26th of December, 2017? If so, could you please summarize what you remember?" (( @Maikeyy2 @ThatGuy @Zebulon @JayZawack ))

"Your honor, The defense would like to call Robbie Garth to the stand as it's first witness." (( @ThatGuy @Zebulon @Maikeyy2 @JayZawack ))