-
Content Count
1,921 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Urshankov last won the day on August 19 2019
Urshankov had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
1,135 ReveredAbout Urshankov
-
Rank
Veteran Member
- Birthday December 20
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
England
Game Information
-
Ingame Account
Urshankov
Recent Profile Visitors
-
-
-
2
-
- Report
- Show previous comments 1 more
-
How did you get onto the internet?!?!?! Didn't know they had it in the care home
-
-
1
-
- Report
-
-
-
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"Very well, since the Defence has shown no intention of issuing a closing statement, I shall now pass judgement" -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"Yes, it shall be allowed." (( @Zebulon @Ryoichi )) -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"Very well, the Prosecution may state their closing argument followed by that of the Defendant." (( @Zebulon @Ryoichi )) -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"I shall allow Mr. Anderson to withdraw on the basis that refusing to acknowledge or interact on a client-attorney basis with State provided legal aid, as offered within the Miranda Rights, is comparable to waiving such rights. Such shall apply in all further hearings, unless overruled by a higher court with greater jurisdiction or the Chief Justice or if there is evidence of moral or ethical objections, for example, if the Attorney had some evidential prejudice towards the Defendant - of course the burden of proof lies on the Defendant unless an Attorney voluntarily withdraws when such claims -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"That is correct, Mr. Cooper. It would be nonsensical to charge the entire Department for an offence that you, as an individual, allegedly committed - within both Traffic and Criminal Court proceedings, a Law Enforcement or Peace Officer are generally held to higher standards than the average civilian by virtue of position, it is expected that you as an actively serving LEO have a degree of professional legal knowledge. For example, if a Taxi driver were to commit an offence, the Corporation could not be held responsible unless they acted in a grossly negligent manner by hiring the individual -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
**Moss briefly looks down to the Clerk of the Court as she'd hand him some papers that he'd scan through quickly** "I am inclined to agree with the Prosecution. As per the ruling of Miranda v. Arizona, the usage of testimonial evidence in the context of a Criminal Investigation, 6 rules must be applied, they are, as I quote: Evidence must have been gathered. The evidence must be testimonial. The evidence must have been obtained while the suspect was in custody. The evidence must have been the product of interrogation. The interrogation mu -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"What part of the contact between yourself, the Undersheriff and the Prosecution do you deem, or believe, to be unlawful?" (( @Ryoichi )) -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"Mr. Cooper, are you trying to tell the courthouse that you lied to both the District Attorney and the Undersheriff on the basis that you didn't feel obligated to tell the truth since he had not announced his position?" (( @Ryoichi @Zebulon @JameZ )) -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
"The question holds bearing on the charges that have been raised, in addition to the recently questioned charges of contempt or perjury. Within the Affidavit it is stated that you claimed to have not been in the area at the times in question, this is your chance to raise a defence to the charges brought against you and is a vital part of cross-examination. You could have refused to take to the stand but opted not to. Objection overruled." (( @Ryoichi @JameZ @Zebulon )) -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
**William Moss bashes his gavel against the block, bringing the Courtroom to a controlled silence** "There shall be no outbursts in my Courtroom." **Moss then proceeds to glance towards Mike** "I shall like to remind you that Mr. Anderson, your assigned Public Defender, has served the State for a number of years and has yet to receive a complaint, to my knowledge on the basis of moral or ethical reasoning and such accusation comes as a surprise. As per judicial precedent in other US District Courts, since no ruling is such present within the State of San And -
[TRAFFIC] The People v. Mike Cooper - 08/09/2019
Urshankov replied to Zebulon's topic in Traffic Chamber
(( @Ryoichi ))