Jump to content

Restrepo

Members
  • Content Count

    759
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Restrepo last won the day on September 15 2018

Restrepo had the most liked content!

4 Followers

About Restrepo

  • Rank
    Veteran Member
  • Birthday 01/01/2000

Contact Methods

  • Discord
    Restrepo#1212

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    United States of America

Game Information

  • Ingame Account
    Restrepo
  • Factions
    Los Santos Police Department
  • Characters
    Scott Murphy, Zachary Wilson

Recent Profile Visitors

2,405 profile views
  1. Yeah that's what I thought as well being forcefully able to move someone but I just want it mostly for the animation. I don't think it would be an issue as long only PD have access to it and making sure it is roleplayed before moving someone. I'd like to have vehicle mods in the near future not now but I guess that is a personal preference. The skins are actually a really good suggestions I'll add that on the list, also if you're able to customize them with hats/gloves/etc.
  2. Script Suggestion What would be the name of the script(s)?- SD improvements. What kind of script(s) are you suggesting?- Faction What is the suggestion?- - Vehicle mods (simple ones nothing over the top, preferably with low downloads for the near future) - Siren mods (simple ones nothing over the top, preferably with low downloads for the near future) - Speed LIDAR to work properly (I think @Daniels is already working on that) - MDC to show if someone has a license including (driving, gun licenses, etc) - MDC to show if someone has active warrants and the ability to modify warrants on someone etc. - MDC to show arrests/traffic history - Lighting system improvement on other servers I've played on if you press "Q" it turns on lights without sirens and if you press "E" it turns on lights and sirens. F6 is a bit of a hassle sometimes. - A way to search someones inventory and see what they have - A way to move someone when they are cuffed - Vehicle tires to stay the way they are when you get out of the vehicle (not necessary for now but also can be considered for the near future) - Sheriff Uniforms and ability to customize them with hats/gloves/vests/etc (Credit to @Lewis) What are the advantages?- Better improvements for SD in general. What are the disadvantages?- It would effect the download because some of the suggestions being mods. Do you have any resources to support our scripters in making said suggestion?- N/A How would you go about implementing this idea?- This is a list that developers can keep looking at to add for SD after the server becomes stable and all the bugs/issues are fixed.
  3. "Your Honor, The prosecution seems to be mistaken engaging in a "high" speed pursuit if we can even call it that as evidence proves otherwise with a civilian ride-along is no way against the law. There has been several civilians who have been on ride-along's with Officers in the past and none have been charged. Like the prosecution stated Officers are expected to exercise common sense and due diligence which I believe has already been proven on my behalf. Furthermore, concerning the vehicle I was told by my superior Captain Eileen Woodvine that the vehicle was authorized which leads me a reasonable person to believe that the vehicle is authorized. The Command of the LSPD failed to file paperwork on this vehicle which should not come back on me, I was merely following orders as a reasonable person. Additionally, the force behind this case former Officer Marley Greene was dishonorably discharged from the department. Your honor, we cannot take who him himself was discharged for "Major breach of pursuit policies. Attempting to use less-lethal force on a suspect fleeing on a motorbike, whilst operating a motorbike, putting all involved in danger". So your honor, whose word are you going to trust that of a reputable Sergeant in the LSPD or someone who was dishonorably discharged for the aforementioned policies. Not only my words, but all the evidence in the case leads a reasonable person to believe that there was no negligence on my behalf, I was merely executing my duties as a peace officer that I took an oath to do. The prosecution also failed to refute my comments during opening statements on multiple occasions. This again just goes to show that the prosecution does not have any concrete evidence against myself and does not know how to argue my points since they are valid and that of fact. Ultimately, a guilty verdict will be setting a dangerous precedent, essentially disallowing any Officers to go beyond the posted speed limits whilst chasing suspects. It will not only restrict the LSPD, but would also render any of the HSIUs, and much of the TED fleet useless. It will also restrict Officers from performing any LEO duties whilst having a ride-along present in fear of criminal prosecution. Your honor, the evidence is lacking in weight. All physical evidence proves there was no negligence on my behalf and unless the prosecution has some other evidence which has weight to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I committed an act of negligence or otherwise then I should be found not guilty on all accounts of this matter. Thank you your honor, that is all." (( @Urshankov @Zebulon ))
  4. "Your Honor, The defense would like to move to closing arguments as well." (( @Urshankov @Zebulon ))
  5. "Mister Spade, For example if someone decided to fire a weapon at myself and I had no other choice but to fire back then that would be one example. I do not believe that putting the civilian in the HSIU put them in harms way. There has been other accounts where ride along's have been in pursuits and gone double or triple the speed limit so I do not see why I'm hand picked to be prosecuted just because I was driving an HSIU, furthermore the HSIU was driven in a normal manner and was no different then any other pursuit the LSPD has ever had. (( @Urshankov @Zebulon ))
  6. ((I clearly said from the beginning that I was not excessively going over the speed limit and it was moderate speeds which the logs have proved. So we are just going to ignore the physical evidence and just assume that I was going at "High Speeds" when the only physical evidence points to me going 10 over the set speed limit which is moderate like I said in my first statement. I'm done arguing with you, use your common sense next time.))
  7. "Never said that." (( @Urshankov @Zebulon ))
  8. ((Why would we generalize it as "high speeds" if there is an accurate reading of the speed at the current time of the pursuit. Using "high speeds" makes it seem like I was tripling the speed limit when in reality I was going only 10 over the speed limit so generalizing it as "high speeds" is absurd.))
  9. "Mister Spade, No offense but I don't understand your analogy and don't see how it makes any sense to the context of this situation. But to answer your question, I was not going put the ride along in harms way unless my duty absolutely called upon me to do so. I personally don't think putting the ride along in the HSIU had more chances of putting them in harms way. Them being in any police vehicle in general puts them in harms way equally, as the dashcam was reviewed we can see that the HSIU never heavily sped either only going tops of around 63MPH, which may I remind everyone that the speed limit on the roads we were on were 50MPH." (( @Urshankov @Zebulon ))
  10. "Mr. Spade, In the ride-along forum there is a section where they have to sign, one of the sections states "You also recognize the dangers of participating in a ride along with the Los Santos Police Department and the risks to personal safety, and that the Los Santos Police Department cannot be held accountable for any injuries or damage to personal property". Also, no I do not believe this exonerates an Officer from being negligent, nothing does." (( @Urshankov @Zebulon ))
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and follow our Guidelines.