Jump to content

bartman

Members
  • Content Count

    3,066
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

bartman last won the day on August 23

bartman had the most liked content!

About bartman

  • Rank
    Veteran Member
  • Birthday 02/12/1998

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Rhodesia
  • Occupation
    being thanked for my service just right

Recent Profile Visitors

11,146 profile views
  1. name: Chad Comment: > Massive 10 car garage > "Residential Property"
  2. bartman

    [Items] - Colt .45 replacement

    can we make it so you aren't shooting it like Skee-Lo in a music video first
  3. bartman

    [REQUEST FOR INJUNCTION] Des Moines v. Howard

    "Did the defendant leave this act in place at the time of his resignation? If so, your honor, the Plaintiff believes he is still responsible." (( @EvilScotsman @DylanW ))
  4. bartman

    [REQUEST FOR INJUNCTION] Des Moines v. Howard

    "Plaintiff is present your honor."
  5. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS Civil Petition Court of San Andreas, District of Los Santos LaQuisha Des Moines Versus Nicholas Howard Subpart 1. Accusation. In the matter of this civil petition, LaQuisha Des Moines on the Tenth of October, 2018 , accuses Nicholas Howard of: Violation of Fortification of Land And Buildings Ordinance of 2017 Subpart 2. Demands. The plaintiff, LaQuisha Des Moines demands the following: Immediate injunction against the practice of refusing to enforce the above ordinance A written apology to the people of Los Santos for twisting the words of the ordinance for political benefit. Subpart 3. Narrative. Today, 10/6/2018, the CPQL published a notice of their intent to refuse to enforce the Land and Buildings Ordinance of 2017 via exempting every building in the county in one fowl swoop, However, it is my professional opinion that the language of the ordinance prevents this. The only way Mr. Howard could legally refuse to enforce this ordinance is by writing down each and every building in the county as a exempted property. The keyword as referenced below is "explicit" - A broad declaration county-wide is not explicit to each individual building requiring exemption. Subpart 4. Evidence. Exhibit 1. Exhibit 2. Subpart 6. Ancillary Information. Defendant Legal Representation: LaQuisha Des Moines, Esq. Plaintiff Legal Representation: UNK Contact Information: Presiding Judge: X Subpart 7. Declaration. I, LaQuisha Des Moines, affirm that the foregoing is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (( @DylanW @ThatGuy @CuckusMaximus @EvilScotsman @DrJoseEviI ))
  6. bartman

    [STATE] The People V. Kevin Taylor [08/06]

    (( @doo2doo2 @Norm ))
  7. bartman

    [STATE] The People V. Kevin Taylor [08/06]

    "Unless Counsel can present said "Available data" in a coherent and undeniable manner that suggests that policies weren't enforced under Mr. Taylor's own leadership here and now, I will side with the prosecution and strike the question from the record. The witness is not on trial here." (( @doo2doo2 @Zebulon ))
  8. bartman

    [STATE] The People V. Kevin Taylor [08/06]

    "I side with the Prosecution firstly, This is no different than the prosecution asking another doctor if the Defendant was negligent in a medical malpractice case. I will however allow the witness to answer the question posed by the Defense in terms of what the correct protocol would be for such a situation."
  9. bartman

    [STATE] The People V. Kevin Taylor [08/06]

    "Does the defense have any questions for the witness?" (( @doo2doo2 @Zebulon ))
  10. bartman

    [STATE] The People V. Kevin Taylor [08/06]

    "If we could get this over with relatively quickly I will allow it, Bailiff, please swear in Mr. O'Reilly." (( @Zebulon @doo2doo2 @yannickboy15 ))
  11. bartman

    [STATE] The People V. Kevin Taylor [08/06]

    "Very well, Are both sides ready to proceed to closing statements? If so, the Defense may go first." (( @Zebulon @doo2doo2
  12. bartman

    [SAAN] The Hobo Thief's demise

    name: todd comment: F
  13. Unarmed Security Contract - Saint Ernest Medical Center SEMC South is seeking private firms to pursue a Unarmed Security Contract with our facility, including the following job functions: Maintaining at least one staff member on premises at all times ((Whenever hospital staff are online)) Maintaining at least two staff members on premises during peak hours Maintaining a calm, professional demeaner with patients and families Professionally maintaining all situations Maintaining a working relationship with local external law enforcement. Screening all persons entering the hospital, particularly the Emergency Department. Maintaining hospital policies on firearms, tobacco, animals, etc. Following HIPAA rules and regulations. Performing other hospitality tasks as designated. Alert police to all crimes and incidents. The ideal candidate firm: Has a good and strong reputation Has a standing history in the area Is willing to prioritize the hospital over other contracts if the situation arises Has at least four employees able to cycle shifts on site. The hospital will provide: Access to the hospital break room and staff lounge Access to a locker room. Access to a security golf kart. Interested candidate companies should email Chairman of the Board Ethan Wilson, MD at [email protected] (( PM @bartman )) with their offers. The candidate offering the best service for the least cost will be selected.
  14. bartman

    [STATE] The People V. Kevin Taylor [08/06]

    "With respect to the witness, the claim of badgering is sustained. While the remark of "...Taylor called enroute" will be stripped from the record of the Officer Testimony, the official LSPD narrative to my knowledge was not under oath. Even if it was, the Defendant would need to prove that the witness is intentionally deceitful for the narrative that the witness is intentionally misleading the court to hold water. The motion to dismiss is denied as other substantial evidence still exists. Mr Taylor still bypassed a scene in a marked ambulance to pursue his own volition, "On break" or not." (( I clearly stated drivers license with regard to my original post. I apologize that it is taking a while, works' been badgering me though, so I won't pursue that further than the LSPD already has. )) (( @Zebulon @doo2doo2 @Norm
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and follow our Guidelines.