Jump to content


MTA Head Administrator
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Wright

  1. Sol Colinas was contacted to remove debris and rebuild damaged portions of a mansion where a helicopter accident occurred.
  2. Why would we L&A a faction that the leadership did not say has officially closed? That would upset the members and only serve to demotivate them. You can shoot a PM to one of us or make a formal inquiry if you're concerned. They haven't asked to be L&A'd and we cleared out tens of pages a few months back. Unless we start stretching on pages like that again we give factions the ability to return without having to un-archive and unlock threads (people do that often and it creates more work for the forum admin team for no reason).
  3. Have you informed FT you no longer wish to continue with this faction?
  4. “Your honor, May I request my client be given time served considering the length of this case? Additionally, the vehicle was seized and given that he was not charged with a felony charge would it be possible to have his vehicle returned? Thank you” (( @Zebulon I will explain the verdict to him as well ))
  5. "Your Honor, it is our feeling that the prosecution is dragging this case on because of their lack of evidence and convincing arguments they can bring to the table. As it stands, there is no proof of felony public endangerment nor has an argument been made for it. If we observe The State v. Whitefield, a prior case, the courts deemed someone simply travelling in high speeds and changing lanes is not a felony nor is it endangering anyone, especially if vehicles are not behind them. Additionally, Huw Edwards in The State v. Edwards, was travelling at speeds in excess of 250km/h on the very same road way as my client and he was not charged for a felony, despite driving through the red light and having no regard for others on the road way. As it stands currently, the facts of the case are, my client was simply travelling in a direction and passed a vehicle (which is not illegal nor improper to do when driving), and additionally the officer has no recorded speed limit nor does he know how fast my client was actually going. We argue that my client was not speeding nor was he acting recklessly, and instead, the officer uses excessive and dramatic language to imply my client is speeding, using vocabulary such as "blowing past" and "overtaking" without any proof for these accusations. In truth, the reason for my clients crash was that when he turned the corner, the driver of said motorcycle which is parked in the photos the prosecution has provided, was in the middle of the road observing his motorcycle. My client, despite not travelling over the speed limit, hit the brakes and lost control because of this reckless behavior the owner of the motorcycle exhibited. And as we all know, having a car crash is not criminal in a majority of cases especially when not at fault. Additionally, there is no recording of the crash so who are the troopers to say what happened? They didn't see it, as they didn't see the speeding either. Therefore, I ask for a summary judgement based on the arguments I just have provided. Thank you, Your Honor." (( @Unitts @Zebulon @TheNeonGuy ))
  6. Mr. Cunningham, I have sent the requested funds. Attached is the receipt. Thank you, Hugh White (( @tree ))
  7. Mr. Cunningham, I'll add those to the list as well then. I was told to apply and the employee discount would be provided to me as I'm pending employment pending the approval of these licenses. Thank you, Hugh White (( @tree ))
  8. Dear Mr. Cunningham, Is this with the employee discount provided? Thank you, Hugh White (( @tree ))
  9. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Los Santos International Airport Flight School L.S.I.A.F.S License Application Form Contact information Title: [X ] Mr. [ ] Mrs. [ ] Dr. [ ] Other First Name: Hugh Middle Name (if applicable): - Last Name: White Gender: [X] Male [ ] Female Date of Birth: September 15th, 1974 Phone Number: 586185 Current Address: Idlewood Motel, #16 Background information Any criminal record (if yes, list what)?: No. Reference(s): None in the State of San Andreas Do you have any specific medical condition(s) (if yes, list what)?: No. Licenses Set an X in the fields of the licenses you are applying for. [X] ARC [ ] SER [X] ROT [ ] MER [ ] TER [X] CPL Typeratings List the typerating(s) you are applying for. Leviathan (T417) , Cargobob (T548), News Chopper (T488), Police Maverick (T497), Raindance (T563), Seasparrow (T447) Reason for applying (at least 25 words): Pertinent to my job application as a flight instructor at LSIA but also because I know how to fly these from my work experience and have licenses in other States but need them validated here. Any remark(s)?: No, thank you. By filing this application, I agree to always abide by the current laws and instructions of aviation, as given by authorities and LSIA. I understand that my license may get revoked if abused. I understand and agree to that LSIA may access my background information from instances such as the police and medical institutions. I confirm that all information in my application are correct, and that providing false or misleading information is punishable by law. Signature: Hugh White Date: 11/06/2019 ((Out of Character (OOC): Wright Geographical Location (Country, State (if applicable): Canada Timezone: EST In-game username: Wright Do you have any OOC remarks to make? [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, state here: - Discord name (name#1234): -
  10. LSIA - Job Application SECTION I - Personal Information First Name: Hugh Middle Name (if applicable): - Last Name: White Date of Birth: September 15, 1974 Home Address: Idlewod Hotel Room, #16 Phone Number: 586185 E-Mail Address: [email protected] Are you a citizen of the United States of America? [X] YES; [ ] NO If not, are you legally allowed to work in the United States? [ ] YES; [ ] NO Have you ever been a witness in a crime or been arrested for a felony? [ ] YES; [X] NO If so, please elaborate on the misdemeanors or felonies committed: RESPONSE SECTION II - Occupation and Education Which job would you like to apply (We currently only hire Flight Instructors): Flight Instructor Do you have any past work experience? [X] YES; [ ] NO If so, state them here: U.S Army Pilot of 20 years, achieved rank of Chief Warrant Officer 3  Please state all types of licenses that you possess (Driving license, weapon licenses, pilot licenses with their type ratings, etc.) : Drivers License Have you attended high school? [X] YES; [ ] NO If so, state your high school name: Bangor Highschool, Maine Have you attended College/University? [ ] YES; [X] NO If so, state their name(s): RESPONSE SECTION III - Motivation (Minimum 80+ words) Please tell us a bit about yourself? At the age of 18, I enlisted in the U.S Army and had a contract to attend flight school immediately after boot camp. I graduated warrant officer candidate school and shortly after attended the flight training program at Fort Rucker, Alabama. After graduating flight training, I was assigned to 1st Battalion, 82nd Aviation Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, North Caorlina, and specialized in flying the UH-60 Black Hawk. I flew support missions first in Afghanistan and later the Second Gulf War. I retired after 20 years of service to pursue hobbies such as recreational flying and contract work for news organizations, flying news choppers, sight seeing, etc. Please explain in your own words why would you like to join the airport? I would like to be able to provide my expertise and knowledge through the airport and teach others how to fly in a safe manner. I also feel it would be a fitting job for me and that the airport would benefit from having knowledgeable on rotary aircraft such as myself. Do you possess any other certifications that it may help you joining the department? My licenses do not carry over to this State from my prior place of residence. Me, Hugh White, agree to always abide by the current laws and instructions, as given by authorities and FAA. I understand that my contract may get terminated if found needed by the Administration of the Los Santos International Airport. I understand and agree to that FAA may access my background information from instances such as the police and medical institutions. I confirm that all information in my application is correct and that providing false or misleading information is punishable by law and by signing below I accept the Los Santos International Airport Terms and conditions ((found here)). (( SECTION IV - OOC SECTION )) In-game username: Wright Admin History (temp link from owlgaming.net): None Hoursplayed (in account): 3955
  11. *Erik Olsson has a folder delivered to the bailiff to hand to the Justice.*
  12. "Thank you, your Honor. I will have the witness submit the affidavit." (( @Zebulon ))
  13. "Prosecution has nothing more to add, your Honor." (( @ThatGuy ))
  14. "Your Honor, the witness who provided the statement is in the court room today with the medication prescription on his person. That is the only proof I can offer should you want to speak to him." "Additionally, your Honor. Given the crippled public transportation system in the County I ask that my client be allowed to drive, perhaps with restrictions? Rather than be barred all together." (( @Zebulon @Unitts @TheNeonGuy ))
  15. *Erik Olsson enters the court room and stands where designated prior to speaking* "Legal council for Mr. Palazzo is present. We are open to a plea deal if the offer is made." (( @Unitts ))
  16. "Your Honor, the way this report is worded is greatly exaggerated. Technically anyone passing another vehicle in traffic, within legal limits, is considered "overtaking" a vehicle. There is no substance to the argument that it was done in a dangerous or aggressive manner, and driving aggressively to my knowledge is not against the law and is therefore just word play to make my clients actions seem worse than they were." "Additionally, there is no proof my client sped up or attempted to evade police and if this is true, why was he not charged as such? If this is the main point of his being chased then that too is an issue and a great exaggeration." "The way the report is worded is that the Trooper did not see the accident but rather arrived afterwards to see it, and the damage present on the vehicle is very minimal for the supposed speeds my client was driving. Regardless, an vehicular accident where no third party is injured is not illegal. In fact, car crashes themselves are not illegal. Why is my client being singled out? It is also worth noting there is a vehicle illegally parked which may have contributed to this crash." "Again, if my client was such a threat and danger for evading and alleged reckless driving then why did the Trooper not follow up and instead my client was discharged from the hospital with no issues?" "Furthermore, a precedent on alleged reckless driving has been set in the case of The State v. Huw Edwards and The State v. David Whitefield and we believe my clients actions do not warrant the charges." (( @Zebulon @Unitts ))
  17. "There is not much more to state other than the statement was gained from a witness, who was under the influence of medication that alter his accounts of the event in an unjust manner, given that he was just discharged from the hospital for his involvement in the accident." (( @Unitts @Zebulon ))
  18. (( He's blacklisted sooo not sure how this'll play out in that sense ))
  19. "On behalf of my client, I would like it to be known that we are open to a settlement if it is deemed fair by my client." (( @DrJoseEviI @ThatGuy ))
  20. "We are also requesting to post bail, your Honor." (( @Zebulon ))
  21. "My client pleads not guilty and we ask that the witness statement, exhibit #2, be struck from the record as it was obtained from someone under the influence of potent pain medication." (( @Zebulon ))
  22. *Erik Olsson enters the court room and stands beside David Whitefield.*
  23. "The prosecution would like to reiterate case law on this matter where a toy gun is considered a dangerous weapon, citing United States v. Medved, United States v. Cannon, United States v. Martinez-Jimenez, and United States v. Perry: "The reason provided by the courts prior is that "[a] robber who carries a toy gun during the commission of a bank robbery creates some of the same risks as those created by one who carries an unloaded or inoperable genuine gun. First, the robber subjects victims to greater apprehension. Second, the robber requires law enforcement agencies to formulate a more deliberate, and less efficient, response in light of the need to counter the apparent direct and immediate threat to human life. Third, the robber creates a likelihood that the reasonable response of police and guards will include the use of deadly force. The increased chance of an armed response creates a greater risk to the physical security of victims, bystanders, and even the perpetrators. Therefore, the greater harm that a robber creates by deciding to carry a toy gun is similar to the harm that he creates by deciding to carry an unloaded gun.'" Even if this argument is to be dismissed, the defense has provided no proof of this being a toy gun, nor have they provided the alleged toy gun to the courts. It is therefore obvious a real gun was used, especially after one of Mr. Gibson's associates opened fire on police and the other threw his weapon into the bush when evading police. The defense is lying by omission to try and prove a point which will not work here. Additionally, our witness has outlined to us the facts of the case: he believed it to be a real weapon, there was no indication of it being fake (orange tip, etc) and they invoked fear into the gas station attendants." "Thank you, your Honor." (( @ThatGuy @JameZ ))
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and follow our Guidelines.